Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Leopold Zima vs Gabriel Decamps Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zima vs Decamps analysis and find out who is favored!
Leopold Zima vs Gabriel Decamps Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zima 1 - 0 Decamps
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zima has won 42.11% of points on their second serve, while Decamps has won 48.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zima, in recent form, has won 45.14% of their opponent's second serve points, while Decamps has won 56.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27% and 36.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zima has saved 53.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Decamps has saved 55.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zima has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 27/ 24), with Decamps winning 62.71% (W/L 37/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 61/ 58). Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22), where as Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.09% of matches (W/L 32/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zima winning 1 times and Decamps being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zima winning 2 and Decamps winning 1. The last match between Zima and Decamps was at the M25 Quinta Do Lago, 05-03-2024, Q3, Hard with Leopold Zima getting the victory 7-5 6-7(7) 10-8.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zima and Decamps have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zima winning 1 times and Decamps 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zima winning 0, and Decamps 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zima has played against opponents with an average rank of 129.29 while Decamps has played against players with an average rank of 188.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zima has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Decamps has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zima has converted 39.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Decamps has converted 45.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
895
Rank
774
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
621
Rank
262
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
56% (158-126)
Career Total W/L
63% (164-96)
62% (18-11)
YTD W/L
66% (21-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Leopold Zima | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 23 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:0 | 2:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (63/104) | 56% (43/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (47/63) | 70% (30/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (18/41) | 59% (20/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 10% (1/10) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (27/77) | 38% (39/104) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-7(7) 10-8 |
Stats 
Leopold Zima
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Leopold Zima | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (18/11) | 66% (21/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (38/29) | 65% (45/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (334/315) | 57% (356/271) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 74% (14/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 70 | 65 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 105 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 105.76 | 162.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (663/986) | 61% (1092/1777) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (460/663) | 68% (746/1092) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (136/323) | 49% (334/685) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (28/71) | 47% (107/228) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (313/924) | 44% (842/1897) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (18/10) | 68% (19/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (18/29) | 69% (20/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 100% (18/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 0% (18/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 21% (14/3) |
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filippo Romano
Player
Leopold Zima
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leopold Zima
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Milos Karol
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Leopold Zima
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Pieczonka
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve %
23%
(
3 of
13)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
13
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Gabriel Decamps
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Jonas Trinker
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Marino Jakic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Gabriel Decamps
52%
(
53 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Gabriel Decamps
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Bancalari
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Antonio Nunez
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Zima Vs Decamps Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zima are available here and Decamps photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Leopold Zima
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
